Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Sandwich Structures and Materials
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reyes, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Article

Mechanical Behavior of Thermoplastic FML Reinforced Sandwich Panels

German Reyes*

Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan-Dearborn, Dearborn, MI, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: greyesv{at}umd.umich.edu.


   Abstract

Sandwich panels manufactured using thermoplastic fiber-metal laminates (FML) skins and an aluminum foam core were tested under quasi-static and low-velocity impact loading conditions. The quasi-static properties of the sandwich beams were evaluated using the three-point bend test geometry. Energy absorbing mechanisms such as buckling and interfacial delamination in the FML skin, as well as indentation, crushing, and densification in the aluminum foam have been observed to contribute to the excellent energy absorbing characteristics offered by these systems. The low-velocity impact behavior of the sandwich panels was evaluated using an instrumented dropping weight impact tower and modeled using an energy balance approach. A breakdown of the energy absorption revealed that these sandwich structures absorb much of the impact energy due to contact and bending effects. Finally, four-point bend testing after low-velocity impact revealed that these systems offer excellent residual flexural strength with relative values remaining close to 80% of the original strength after a 32 J impact.

First published on June 5, 2009
Journal of Sandwich Structures and Materials 2009, doi:10.1177/1099636209103287


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?